Judging Books By Their Covers

I’m reading Angela Carter’s Nights At The Circus at the moment and I am completely overawed by her sumptuous, inventive prose. Why have I never read her novels before? She’s the kind of writer I love best; the beauty and the quality of her prose actively gives me pleasure to read it, but I’m compelled onwards by the fantastic flights of the story she tells. It’s a rich book to be savoured, but it’s also a seductive book that won’t let you put it down. The only thing I have against it, is that I don’t like the cover. The baroque decoration that is Carter’s prose deserves something more vibrant and enticing than a cartoonish drawing of a plump lady’s legs, descending from behind the title and author. Fevvers, the main protagonist of the novel is a trapeze artist, and the drawn-up knees and crossed ankles are evocative of her trade, but I find it a little uninspiring and plain. I note as well that it’s part of a series of book covers, all similarly drawn, that must be part of a collective re-issue of Carter’s work. It’s not that I wouldn’t buy them because of their covers (I have a nasty feeling that after this taste of her work, I’ll be visiting amazon online all too soon), but I do wish that they were different.

Of course covers are difficult to judge, appealing wholly to our subjective tastes. But covers are also a clear indication of genre and intended readership. It’s no coincidence that Penguin modern classics are an attractive but subtle duck-egg blue with reportage style black and white photographs on the front, whilst chick-lit comes in pastel shades with embossed lettering. Publishers have a good idea which visual buttons to press, and given the way that bookstores like to display books face forwards these days, a lot of effort and thought goes into cover design. There have been occasions when I’ve not bought a book because I’ve disliked its cover, and I’ve certainly chosen one book over another on the feeble grounds of aesthetic attractiveness. I’ve been drawn to try new authors because I’ve thought the book appealing, and I’ve also been thoroughly confused by those sets of similar covers (à la Carter) that are designed to indicate the work of one author but whose lack of differentiation means I’ve bought books I already possess. I have to say that I am even more pleased with my purchase, if a book I’ve wanted turns out to be a beautiful object as well. This may sound shallow – it probably is! – but my son is much worse than me, and quite blatant about it; his reading choices are entirely determined by the picture on the front of the book. When you really think about it, the impact of the cover is disproportionately significant, no matter what well-meaning maxims might suggest.

It’s always been a lot of nerve-wracking fun to pick pictures for the covers of the academic books I’ve published. I don’t think I’m the only serious-minded professional to fall for the lure of a pretty cover, so I’ve regularly gone for a bit of art rather than a simple block design, but it’s always been very hard to come to a decision. When I wrote a book that covered the whole of the twentieth century in French literature I reeled a little at the prospect of a whole century’s art to choose from. However, not wanting a photograph on the cover cut down the possibilities quite significantly. I ended up choosing a picture of the Eiffel tower painted by Robert Delauney (and there’s another love story I could tell you all, concerning his marriage to another artist, Sonia). The latest book, however, (the one that’s with the publisher at the moment) was a very particular challenge as it concerns the erotic in contemporary fiction and film. Finding something suggestive (in all senses) that wasn’t going to offend or alarm readers was really tricky. We decided to go for something by the modern British artist, Lucie Bennett, and whilst I’d better not indicate what we did choose at this pre-publication moment, I can say that we very nearly went for Pink Pixie (in the Jungle series). Unlike Angela Carter’s books, I think the simple line drawings work here, because no one in their right minds could honestly describe academic prose as sumptuous. Hopefully the clean lines will suggest that what my colleague and I were writing is accessible. The actual cover is a very vibrant colour and will certainly attract attention if nothing else! It is a little tense at times, however, waiting for publication and wondering what people will think.

20 thoughts on “Judging Books By Their Covers

  1. Pingback: Nights at the Circus » Book Design

  2. The Passion of New Eve pretty much changed my life. Although the effects have been slow to fully arise it really shifted the way I looked at things. I hated the colour though.
    On the other hand my copy of Nights at the Circus is a riot of red and orange in bold striking patterns suggestive of feathers and feminitity with a stylised face in the middle, making it clear that the colour is all flowing from the crown of that head.

    It came free with a newspaper too, they were doing an offer at the uni. I had to pick one of three books in a hurry, and it had to be the one with the riot of colour.

    Served me well (though due to uni work I had to put the book down after the incredible first section. Time to dig it back out perhaps).

    Anyway…the cover sold me on it (it was before I had read New Eve).

    Funny that it’s that book that bought you to this topic.

  3. How interesting, Alabaster! I wish I had the same edition as you do of Nights at the Circus! And thank you for the recommendation. I am very keen to read more Carter now that I’ve begun.

  4. Covers are important for me too — I’ll definitely choose one edition over another because of the cover. And it does sound very difficult to choose what goes on your own cover!

  5. Oh, Angela Carter… Did you hear me sighing at even the mention of her name? I’ve never read her novels, but I truly love her short stories. Her reinventions of fairy tales blew me away, and continue to blow me away, every time I read them. I obviously must pick up NIGHTS AT THE CIRCUS right away (even if I have to avoid the cover).

  6. When I was at university in the mid-90s, Angela Carter was a popular inclusion on reading lists for 20th lit subjects, so I read quite a few of her books then. I really enjoyed her writing, so I must revisit! Like Nova, I think her short stories are fantastic, particularly her rewriting of Bluebeard, ‘The Bloody Chamber’.

  7. Ah, Miss V, you got in before me – you were the one who introduced me to Angela Carter. She’s awesome, Litlove.

    What I really hate with covers is when the illustrator obviously hasn’t read the book at all, and the characters look nothing like the description within (blonde haired heroine on the cover when inside she’s described as red-headed etc). Call me picky, but it really gives me the pip.

  8. I feel exactly the same way about covers. A major part of my attachment to the Penguin Classics have been the design (even if the actual book isn’t made as well as one would hope). I’ve avoided 99.9% of fantasy authors published today because of their horrific covers: all muscley bound men swinging swords, deformed dwarfs and “comely” maidens. Yuck. The folks at “Literary Saloon” make me feel guilty about this from time to time, but, well, what can you do. :p

  9. Dorothy – I’m glad it’s not just me! Nova – I loved The Bloody Chamber, but haven’t read anything else. I’m very keen to read all her work now. Missv – I would have loved to read her at university when I could have done a bit of critical reading. I should think her work really responds well to that! Legal Eagle – I quite see what you mean – rather like watching a film version of a novel that has made all the characters into Hollywood beauties! Imani – I do quite understand why you wouldn’t want to be seen about in public with the muscle men and the maidens. It is what it is. Amy – thank you for that! I shall go and visit it right now.

  10. Fun with Angela Carter. I’ve read two of her books, one a novel and one short stories. Enjoyed them both and your post makes me wonder why I haven’t read more.

    As for books and covers, a bad cover won’t deter me if I really want to read the book, but a good cover will persuade me to take a chance on a book I know nothing about. It would be an interesting experiment if all book covers were the same except maybe each publisher would have a different color so orange covers were penguin and Knopf had purple covers or something like that. I wonder how it would change the way books were not only marketed but the way we chose what ones we wanted to read.

  11. I hate to say it, but I know I judge books by their covers. I’m positive that if I like the cover of a book, I’m much more likely to respond favorably to it while reading it (it’s almost as if I have to prove to myself I was right to be so drawn to its cover, like a good-looking date, who MUST have something more than looks to say for himself, because I can’t possibly be so superficial). And just the other day, I was at the library looking for a book by T.M. Wright who was recommended to me as being scary and someone I might like. I picked up the only book by him on the shelf, and its “The-Book-of-Chucky”-like cover really almost made me put it back on the shelf. But then I read the first few pages and decided it might be something worth reading after all. Also, my untested hunch tells me that gathering people together to decide on a cover causes more anger (expressed, unexpressed, expressed behind others’ backs, etc.) at publishing companies than anything else.

  12. I love book covers, too, Litlove. I could write my own very long post about cover designs that either enhance or diminish the contents of books I own. Just two vivid examples for now, though. I don’t like to see Robert Jay Lifton’s indispensable “The Nazi Doctors” on the shelf. He didn’t have much choice, I suppose. It’s the perfect title, but I’ve covered it with black tape. There may be a swastika under there, too. I forget. I recognize the book by the author’s name alone. My copy of Robert Musil’s “The Man Without Qualities” is two big hardbound volumes in a slipcase. A shadowy photograph of a man’s head spans the two books, together more than five inches wide on the shelf. My unnatural affection for this book I haven’t read is entirely due to a designer’s brilliance and skill.

    For extra credit, by all means check out Tobias’s blog about book jackets:
    http://outerwearforbooks.typepad.com/

  13. Stefanie – you are almost describing the French book market. When French books first come out there are several publishers who only use white or cream jackets. It’s very odd, but you sort of get used to it. There’s usually a very cryptic blurb too. It does mean that impulse buying is rare! Emily – I’m fascinated by what you say about those meetings! And impressed that you are overcoming that cover… Brian – Yes, it’s true, it is impossible to please all of the people, all of the time. David – what a sensitive soul you are! I’m glad to know that the Musil pleases you as much as the Lifton doesn’t. And I checked out the site – where do I sign up for my extra credit?

  14. LOL at Son Litlove judging books solely by their covers. I think we are all compelled to do so at some time or the other. Very interesting to read about your choice of covers for your academic texts. I would like to read them someday, but I absolutely have to read everything on this blog first!

    In the interest of full disclosure: The only reason I decided to check out Portrait of a Lady (Henry James) from a public library was that I was disturbed and intrigued by the cover picture. I hadn’t read anything by James at the time. It showed a close-up of a giant hand across a woman’s slim corseted torso. (I think it was the edition that came out before Jane Campion’s film. Thus, Hand=John Malkovich, Torso=Nicole Kidman)

  15. I think I will have to pick up my Angela Carter book (I’m going to be reading Saints and Strangers–short stories) sooner rather than later now. I have had a stack of books by her on my shelves for years–why have I never picked them up? I am a sucker for a good cover, too. I have been known to look for a different edition if a cover doesn’t appeal to me–very superficial, but I can’t help it. I never thought I would like a plain cover, but I have to say I love the books published by Persephone Books–they are gorgeous and elegant! I didn’t realize that authors got to choose their own cover design–or is it just academics? I love the Delauneys–good choice. Good choice of artist for your new book, too! Line art can be gorgeous as well (think of Picasso or Matisse!). Some of Colette’s older editions have nice line drawings as well. Most of our acdemic books (that I see come into my library) are boring beyond belief!

  16. Polaris – what a sweetie you are! And I do encourage full disclosure on this site. I’m sure Henry James wouldn’t have minded in the least that the picture made you pick up his book. He was delighted to find a reader under any circumstances. Danielle – I do agree about Persephone Books – they are almost edible! Choosing pictures was hard so I am extremely pleased if you liked them. Academic books can be awfully dull, so I hoped to liven it up a bit. And I can’t wait to hear what you think of the Angela Carter!

Leave a comment