Ragnarok

Whilst it is the business of myth to put powerfully enigmatic stories in the places that we find numinous and inexplicable – like the start of the world, for instance – probably none are quite so fascinated by destruction and disaster as the Norse Myths. The one word ‘Ragnarok’ most vividly evokes this collection of stories, and refers to the final apocalyptic battle of the Gods in which they all die, bringing their world down with them. It was interesting to me to think that this was the myth that A. S. Byatt would choose to update for the Canongate series, when I think of her as such a controlled writer, so coolly organised and mentally astute. What she has written is a tribute to the difficult nature of Norse mythology, an unflinching account of its radical strangeness, and its dark, demonic passions. And then she has added on the end a neat, intelligent overview that carefully steers these awkward myths into an academic parking place.

Unlike other writers in this series, Byatt has resisted the impulse to turn the myths into an allegorical story. Instead, she has chosen to focus on their reception by using as a focaliser the autobiographical figure of the ‘thin child’. The thin child has recently been evacuated to the country with her mother, her father being sent to certain death (she believes) in the air force. She is reading Bunyan’s Pilgrim’s Progress and then this, Asgard and the Gods, written by an academic German author. For the thin child, the Norse myths have emotional resonance with her own world, plunged into warfare that may well last forever, or so it seems. They certainly make more sense of what is happening around her than the gentle, tepid myths of Christianity which she wishes she could believe but cannot. The narrative that unfolds now follows on from, and elaborates, the thin child’s experience of her reading.

The creation of the world in which the Norse myths take place is a perplexing one. In the gulf of nothingness, Ginnungagap, stretched between icy wastes to the north, hellish hot ones to the south, a giant is formed, Ymir. The first Norse Gods set upon the giant and slaughtered him, making their world out of his body. In its centre they placed the home of the Gods, Asgard, and around it were the gardens of Midgard, where other giants lurked. Odin, the leader of the gods lived in Valhalla, the hall where those slaughtered in the endless daily battles were brought back to life. For these Gods are even more capricious and argumentative than the Greek and Roman ones, existing only in conflict. Somewhere in this world (and if anyone can enlighten me as to how they fit in, please do), there are two great natural resources, the tree of life, Yggdrasil, and the sea-tree, Rándrasill. These are important in Byatt’s retelling of the myth as they support a huge and complex eco-system, a rich flourishing of plant and animal life that spawn great passages of lyrical, concentrated Byatt prose. The almost excessive attention the author gives to this natural world is there, I think, to balance out the destructive nature of the Gods, but also to give the reader an idea of what they waste and plunder.

At the centre of the Norse myths is the figure of Loki, the God of mischief and misrule. Loki is clever and intelligent, but he is also irresponsible, a trickster. His power is that of the demonic, the fierce uprush of energetic life that can be turned to good or evil, the ferocious spirit of humankind that metes out creation and destruction without purpose or plan. We see this in his dual family life – one ‘regular’ family in Asgard, and three demonic children, spawned from his shapeshifting liaison with a wolf-giantess. These children are suitably disparate – a wolf, a snake and a giantess. Knowing that these children spell doom to the Gods, Odin does his best to contain them. The giantess, Hel, is sent to the freezing cold lands in the north to look over those who have not died in battle. The snake is thrown far into the sea, where she grows outlandishly large, eventually swallowing her own tail as she encircles the world. The wolf is set upon by the Gods who try to tie him down, and finally manage it on the third attempt.

This is the thing about the Norse myths: they are hard to hold in the mind because they exist on a foundation that is inconsistent, jagged, disparate; if they are destined to disaster it must be because of this basic incoherence. You can see it in the impossible-to-imagine landscape of the Norse world, you can see it in the three ‘unorthodox’ children that Loki fathers. And it struck me again in the magical bindings the Gods create to hold Fenris the wolf down, fashioned on commission by the dwarves:

And the dwarves made a supple skein from unthings. There were six, woven together: the sound of a cat’s footfall, the beard of a woman, the roots of a mountain, the sinews of a bear, the breath of a fish and the spittle of a bird. The thing was light as air and smooth as silk, a long, delicate ribbon.

The world of the Norse myths has its seemingly constant repetitions, like the resurrection of the Gods, but this is a pecularly constructed world, one that shivers on the edge of imbalance for all its richness and recklessness. When the Gods suspect that Loki is behind the death of their beloved Baldaur, the beautiful God who brings spring and liveliness into their world, they decide they’ve had enough of his behaviour. They track him down and overcome him. But this whole story, the only thing that feels like a proper story in Byatt’s retelling, the death of Baldaur and the God’s revenge, sets in motion the ultimate destruction of the world through an entropy that ressembles environmental crisis:

The spring of the world was gone. There was a rainbow but it was watery and incomplete, patches of hectic colour here and there in the thick cloud, which never seemed to lift. The tides, swelled by tears, were irregular and unpredictable. Things on the earth drooped in their wetness which would not quite dry. Yggdrasil had stains of mould and decay. Rándrasill was scraped bare, in places, by rasping tongues licking up tearwater. A kind of sloth was at the heart of things.

Loki tied down by the Gods for bad behaviour – the serpent drips poison which his wife tries to catch in a bowl.

Loki breaks free, followed by his bad children, and in the ensuing battle with the Gods, everything, but everything, is destroyed. Having recounted the myths from the perspective of the thin child, who is pleased with this finality, Byatt then adds a coda from the perspective of the adult she has become. Myths, she says, are not explanations, they are not allegories, and yet the contemporary parallel with a world spinning towards ecological disaster exerts its own magnetism:

If I were writing an allegory [Loki] would be the detached scientific intelligence which could either save the earth or contribute to its rapid disintegration. As it is the world ends because neither the all too human gods, with their armies and quarrels, nor the fiery thinker know how to save it.

This is a perfectly shaped ending to a series of myths that resist coherence and easy assimilation, that are rich in resonance but recount folly and misadventure with dire consequences. Byatt writes a strange, hybrid text here, neither story nor analysis, although containing elements of both, and as ever her work requires an alert and responsive reader. She doesn’t make this heterogeneous narrative slip down the reading throat. But she evokes something fascinating and then gives us a lot to think about, which is precisely what a good myth should do.

I read this for the Slaves of Golconda blog group. Find other reviews of the book there.

15 thoughts on “Ragnarok

  1. I have been fascinated by norse myth since primary school. When we were invited to take a book with us on leaving to go on to comprehensive school I took Roger Lancelyns Green’s ‘Myths of the Norsemen’ with me. No wonder so many fantasy fiction writers have been influenced by them. I think Its interesting to speculate how the skalds that told the stories through the long nights of winter might have woven elements of christianity eg into them to mention just one possible ‘outside’ influence on the essentially pagan tales.

    • I am a late arrival on the Norse Myth scene, although my son had some of them either in easier to read form, or in Alan Gibbons brilliant mythology-based stories for children. I know what you mean about Christian elements woven into them. It’s something that Byatt picks out occasionally. The whole study of mythology is fascinating, so I quite understand why you love it.

  2. I’ve been wanting to get this since it first came out and now I am even more keen, such a cracking post! I was a little disappointed with The Children’s Book, which I thought was overwhelmed by Byatt’s research, but this hybrid sort of book sounds as if it would be well suited to her as academic and as novelist.

    • Helen, not wishing to be impolite to Byatt (who I love) in any way, there is a grace in the brevity of this narrative! Too much of it would have been indigestible, but it’s just about right. I have The Children’s Book still to read and have heard very mixed reviews. But I’ll get to it eventually. She is always interesting as a writer even when she is a bit long-winded.

  3. This sounds very intriguing. And the fact that she didn’t turn it into an allegory is interesting too as is the choice of the myth.
    Were they completely free to choose, do you know? I think it’s powerful stuff to rewrite or work with.

    • I would love to know what process goes into the pairing of author with myth. I feel sure they must be able to choose, within certain parameters. The allegory thing is interesting; Byatt really hovers on the borderline over it, suggesting it and taking away the suggestion at the same time. I find that most intriguing.

  4. Those are interesting choices. A few years ago I stumbled on a collection of Cree stories collected by an anthropologist in the 1920s. I was really struck by how raw they were, quite unlike the much tidier prettier stories that got mushed down before being published in illustrated picture books.

    • Isn’t that intriguing! And I read a post the other day about the Grimm fairy tales, and how unorthodox they are in narrative terms. It would be interesting to look into that more deeply.

  5. This was a really interesting read for me in light of the Greek Myths I’ve been slowly making my way through. They feel so much easier and clear cut, though we’re talking about Byatt doing the ‘retelling’, so that certainly sets the stage. You are right that she definitely asks something of her reader, and I don’t feel really that I met her challenge since I knew nothing about the Norse myths going into this story. It’s been very helpful to me, however, reading the Slaves posts and I feel like now I need to go back to the book and try and make more sense of the stories.

    • I wondered how these would feel to you in the light of your Greek myths project. They are nowhere near as clear cut, are they? I like Byatt a lot, but even so can find her hard going at times. I remember having Possession as my post-degree-exams book and being rather disappointed that it wasn’t the sort of narrative to sweep me away. But I would always try her again. I still want to read The Virgin in the Garden, having loved Still Life.

  6. I read Ragnarok recently and can’t help but gush at the magic spun by A.S.Byatt. I’ve read Norse mythology before but the subject was so dry compared to the Greek mythology. Reading this book, I felt that Byatt’s writing style brought in a fresh breath of life into an existing story. She made as magical as the Greek myths.

  7. Pingback: Ragnarok: The End of the Gods by A.S. Byatt: ** | I Review My Life

  8. Pingback: Book Review: Ragnarök: The End of the Gods by A.S. Byatt « Imperfect Happiness

  9. Pingback: “It’s the end of the world as we know it” … | Annabel's House of Books

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s