The Artist’s Muse

For a little while now I’ve been interested in finding out more about Lou Andreas-Salomé, muse extraordinaire to Nietzsche, Rilke and Freud. I wondered what kind of woman could possibly enchant so many heavyweight literary thinkers, and how could she manage to cover so much ground, as it were, muse-wise? Imagine my delight, then, on coming across Francine Prose’s The Lives of the Muses, a biography of nine inspirational women including Elizabeth Siddell, Hester Thrale, Gala Dali, Charis Weston, and Lou Andreas-Salomé. Prose is a wonderful writer; wry and witty, insightful and lucid, informative and enlightening and I’m enjoying this book so much it’s going to set an awfully high standard for subsequent biographies.

In its earliest conception in classical Greek writings, the relationship between the artist and the muse was one of reciprocity; the woman acting as intermediary for the Gods offered the man access to memory and knowledge that he lacked. The artist would subsequently produce an autonomous text that was not about the female muse, but which celebrated her involvement in the act of creativity. Such an exchange implied a lack on the part of the man that could only be filled by a momentary loss of self-possession as he was inhabited by the power and the insight of the muse. In the historical movement from Classical Greece to Augustan Rome, the poet shrugged off his dependency on some higher power to inspire him, and started to assume that his own creativity was sufficient. Poetic genius became innate, rather than inspired, and the muse was more of a guardian angel that a divine conduit. By the Romantic age, however, the best muse was proving to be a dead one. For a while, the woman was excluded from creativity and the story was all about male mastery.

By the end of the nineteenth century, the figure of the muse was evolving again, and Lou Andreas-Salomé provided an intriguing example of her new incarnation. Lou was a writer and managed to support herself with the proceeds from it – a rare accomplishment in those times. She was a beautiful, unconventional, intelligent woman whose mind was firmly fixed on distant ideals of God, the self, consciousness and love, which she managed to conflate together in her many affairs with equally passionate and spiritual writers. Lou’s brilliance, however, was to recognise the power of the triangular relationship. She was already enjoying a platonic, spiritually elevated relationship with the philosopher Paul Rée when she met Nietzsche (Rée introduced them), an ageing, mentally troubled, syphilitic curmudgeon. Lou whipped up their fervour for truth, love and beauty, bought into the messianic beliefs that inspired their work, whilst playing the men off against one another. The trio eventually collapsed into bitter recriminations, the most vindictive coming from Nietzsche’s over-protective sister, Elizabeth, but Lou had already moved on, marrying the philology professor, Friedrich Carl Andreas, with whom she was to share a half-century of unconsummated marriage. It wasn’t long before Lou’s own publications had attracted the notice of a young, overwrought poet, Rainer Maria Rilke (it was Lou who persuaded him to change his name from Réné to Rainer) and yet again the triangular structure was in place. Later on in life, when Lou moved into the newly-formed psychoanalytic circle and became one of Freud’s most important interlocutors, she had the insight to play him off against his rival, Alfred Adler. It proved repeatedly to be an unbeatable strategy in drawing fervent male attention onto herself and ensuring that it was sustained by the fires of male jealousy and possessiveness.

But Lou’s talents were greater than this. What Francine Prose suggests she possessed by the truckload was an ability to empathise with the artist and his work that was as powerful as the most addictive drug:

‘Both Nietzsche and Rilke, it will be noted, commenced their most creative and important work in the period immediately following their separation from Lou. Perhaps it was just coincidence, and yet it seems clear that Lou (whom Freud would later refer to as “the great understander”) offered both men a generous, deceptively unlimited abundance of understanding, admiration, encouragement, a sense of common mission, a vision of the future, and the explicit or implicit promise that they would enter that future together. The abrupt and shocking retraction of that promise was (as much as Lou herself) the muse that inspired them to seek out the consolations and distractions of work, and to re-create, alone and for themselves, some version of what they had counted on sharing with Lou. When Lou ceased understanding, it was necessary for them both to make the world understand, in her place.’

All of which makes me think about the odd conjunction of man, woman and artistic creativity. On the one hand there’s a series of ill-starred relationships between difficult, unstable men, and a manipulative woman in love with idealism, on the other there’s the creation of some of the most significant literary work of the twentieth century. The life experience – messy, painful, fraught, overheated, becomes transformed into wisdom, beauty, originality, insight. All of which begs the question: if they had lived sane and emotionally reasonable lives, would they have created such great art? Is there inevitably a price to pay for creativity, and is it the loss of a balanced, harmonious life? The only person who emerged well from these turbulent struggles was Lou herself, who remained always the agent of her own destiny and the unchallenged creator of herself as a joyfully generous muse, despite the anguish she caused.

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “The Artist’s Muse

  1. This is the question with which I’ve struggled for years: does “greatness” come from some sort of innate ability to see the world in a unique and rare way, which brings with it an extreme struggle with that world and others in it? Or does expending all the energy and effort needed in order to be “great,” and the inevitable denial that grows from that, necessarily mean suffering in every other part of a person’s life? It’s hard to find great artists whose biographies aren’t psychological horror stories. One friend of mine always mentions Jane Austen when I start harping on this. Interesting that the one example we can come up with is a woman. (And now, as always, I want to read this book about the muses.)

  2. This books is in my TBR pile – purchased it after reading, and then teaching, her wonderful essay “Going Native,” which I highly recommend. Now I’m even more looking forward to openng up this book! I find her writing really inspiring, luminous, actually.

  3. Last time I was in NY I picked up a copy of her book “You alone are real to me: rememebering Rainer Maria Rilke” – its in my TBR pile (mountain)/

  4. I read Rilke’s letters a few years ago and was very moved by them and yet longed for Lou’s side of their correspondence. I will track down a copy of this book. Thanks for the recommendation.

  5. I ended up with Lou after a fruitless search for somthing to do with Rilke and Ronda, Andalucia. It would have been more profitble to read that wonder where he had been, but that is part of the process of getting to know a writer too, I guess.

    The Hotel Reina Victoria in Ronda has a Bronze of Rilke on the terrace looking over towards the Guadiaro valley, which I posted a photo of quite a few posts ago, but can’t find in the archive for the permanlink. It would interest me to know what he was writing there apart from The Spanish Trilogy (he returned to Ronda several times, I think) and whether this was during his Lou Period. (Sorry….)

    I have accummuated quite a few Lou related links in the bloroll over the last year or so, some of which may prove interesting to you. There are odd extracts from his letters. This photo of Lou, Nietsche and Rilke:

  6. “It’s hard to find great artists whose biographies aren’t psychological horror stories” Yeah, so true…..Damm!!!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s