If you had to describe yourself in a couple of sentences, how would you do it? A fun-loving book-addict? An analytical romantic? A hard-working administrator with a wild side? It’s really not that easy to do, and harder still if those few sentences are supposed to get you a date. I’m loving the publicity that’s doing the rounds at the moment for a Christmas-market publication that’s an outrageous collection of lonely hearts adverts from the London Review of Books. I read this section occasionally in the Green Room in college where all the papers are, because these hardy souls have created the most extraordinary art form out of parody and self-denigration. Here are a few examples:
Sinister-looking man with a face that only a mother would love: think of an ageing Portillo with a beard and you have my better-looking twin. Sweetie at heart, though. Nice conversation, great for dimly-lit romantic meals. Better in those Welsh villages where the electricity supply can’t be guaranteed. Charitable women to 50 appreciated. Box no. 0364.
Eager-to-please woman, 36, seeks domineering man to take advantage of her flagging confidence. Tell me I’m pretty, then watch me cling.
Save it. Anything you’ve got to say can be said to my lawyer. But if you’re not my ex-wife, why not write to box no. 5377? I enjoy vodka, canasta, evenings in, and cold, cold revenge.
To some, I am a world of temptation. To others, I’m just another cross-dressing pharmacist. Male, 41.
A girlfriend isn’t a girlfriend unless she makes my mother cry with grief every time she visits. For two years now she’s sat, contented in front of the TV with not a care in the world. That’s where you come in. Professional M, 38, seeks heartless common slut with no small knowledge of sheltered-housing application procedures. Basingstoke.
Now I’m not sure whether this is a form of humour that’s going to travel well outside the British Isles, where we do tend to think that putting ourselves down with a hint of the ludicrous or surreal is a sub-genre of entertainment, not a reason to contact a therapist. It may not cross too many generational boundaries, either, but I’m sorry, I think they’re funny. After all, you could argue that these people are not exactly describing themselves (well, sometimes you have to really hope not), rather they’re describing the humorous way they view their single status. I may be on my own and no threat to Adonis, they’re saying, but my God I’m good with irony. It’s a way of taking everything pathetic, humiliating, embarrassing, vengeful, clichéd and alarming about searching for a mate, and subjecting it to a deadpan form of celebration.
That question of self-presentation is also apparent, but on the other end of the spectrum in another book that’s also a Christmas publication, Don’t Tell Mum, a collection of emails rounded up from gap year students who have finally found themselves with half an hour on their hands in an internet café in Shanghai. Unfortunately I don’t have any direct quotes as the review my husband heard was on the radio. But he did remember the email that described how the writer and his friends were rounded up and held in the jungle at gunpoint, only to manage to escape later on. ‘Other than that, nothing much has happened’ was the cheery exit line. Whereas the lonely hearters are carefully sculpting their prose to form a Venetian mask of self-parody over their true features, these emails are hasty, ill-considered, exercises of both too much and too little information, blurted out with the good intention of communicating, but in a state of radical divorce from their ultimate audience. If the former are prose poems written in the spirit of Philip Larkin, the latter are condensed airport blockbusters sieved through the imagination of Kafka. And funny only to people who are not blood relatives.
All of which brings me onto my last category of Christmas-related soul-barings, and that’s the (now dying) tradition of the Christmas letter. Do you either write or receive round-robin letters in your Christmas cards? My family have always tended to think of them as an abomination, nerve-jangling exercises in self-glorification that can have no real interest for anyone beyond their author. My husband’s family tends to write them as a matter of course. This could be accounted for by the disparity in family size. If you come from a family that consists in its furthest reaches of no more than a dozen members, you really ought to make the effort to write to people individually. If, as is my husband’s case, you have eight sets of aunts and uncles and almost thirty cousins, they’re probably more necessary. Anyhow, the upshot is that I, the round-robin letter loather, now write a letter every year. Unlike the lonely hearts ads, and the gap year emails, I’m not restricted by space and time, but I wish I had the specificity of their audience. Every year it’s a formidable puzzle to me to select information that might make a reasonably smooth transition between family, friends and (former) work colleagues, without transgressing into my taboo areas (holidays, anecdotes that take too long to explain or will involve third parties, my son’s interests, personal judgements, politics, or anything that falls into the dislikeable category of ‘achievements’). Inevitably it’s one of the hardest things I have to write all year, and I’m horribly conscious of revealing myself with everything I say, as well as with everything I omit.
The way that we explain ourselves in language is my special arena in research, and so I am far too aware of it, at the same time as finding it fascinating when part and parcel of the written archives of others. Every entry we make into language when we say ‘I’ (even implicitly) is an act of both concealment and disclosure, and there’s nothing we can do about that; we always say more than we intend to, even whilst carefully skirting around the shadowy things we don’t want to express. And that self-expression exists always on a knife-edge between collapsing into entertainment on one side, and into invoking horror and repulsion on the other. So this Christmas, you might like to make a special effort with your thank-you letters; it won’t be long before some bright spark decides to publish a collection of the most extreme examples of that particular genre….


Ah, the Christmas letter – I know it well. We used to call them ‘brag letters’ because inevitably the people who send them out do for the mere purpose of bragging about their lives. I have married into a family that writes such letters and it seems every year they try to somehow marginalize my presence in their lives, but these are the same people who sent pictures of their new house out last year with a competition for who could name it. S. often jokes that we should send a ‘fake’ letter asking people to rate our lives (how happy do you think we are? Mark 1 for miserable, 5 for Absolutely freakin’ fabulous…) –
Well, really. I don’t envy you your task. I write those hand-written notes in the cards but then again, I don’t have nearly as many people to send them to! Good luck!
Courtney
Comment by everythinginbetween — December 15, 2006 @ 7:05 pm |
I’m sorry, I can’t stop laughing over those lonely hearts’ descriptions.
Luckily for me, if one can look at it that way, my family doesn’t send Christmas cards.
Comment by LK — December 15, 2006 @ 7:52 pm |
Two of my friends are off to one of those very villages tonight.
Great blog by the way.
Comment by tender [hooligan] — December 15, 2006 @ 7:56 pm |
Courtney, I love the idea of the ‘fake’ letter. I think you should do it! Might be a fun way of convalescing…? LK, I cannot tell you how relieved I am that someone else thinks them funny. Once I’d posted I thought, oops, there goes my hope of ever claiming to have a sophisticated sense of humour… Hello tender [hooligan] and welcome! How wonderful to think there might be eyewitnesses! Do say how they get on.
Comment by litlove — December 15, 2006 @ 8:40 pm |
I will! They’re staying in a beautiful cottage and I’m madly jealous!
Comment by tender [hooligan] — December 15, 2006 @ 8:50 pm |
Hilarious- the humour certainly travels. I especially like the one wanting a girlfriend with detailed knowledge of sheltered housing.
A friend of mine who I had not heard from for some years once sent me an email saying something like John and I were arrested in Signapore then we went to Hong Kong. It was very puzzling since
1. who was John- last I’d heard she was with a Dave?
2. What was she doing in Singapore?
3. Why was she arrested?!?
I’ve since met John but the rest is still a mystery.
I send Happy New Year emails with updates. I try and customize them a bit to the individual though.
Comment by Make Tea Not War — December 15, 2006 @ 9:06 pm |
My, this was a post that I could address from so many angles, touching on the different elements present in it. Mystery e-mails, wildly obscure adverts and vague, almost mythographic letters: they have always fascinated me. I am constantly amazed at how easily we can influence the image others have of us by changing even the tiniest elements in our communication.
I used to, when I wanted to avoid certain conversations (in the pub or at a party), tell people I was an ‘underwater archaeologist’. That made them reel back and try to figure out what was going on. Often it was sufficient for them to seek out other interlocutors. In case they didn’t, and wanted to hear what it was like, I used to reply: but, it’s terribly boring, we simply tally mollusks. That did the trick for sure.
Anyway, that was one of the things I thought of when reading these indeed very funny personals and your erudite (as ever) interpretation of them. Whenever we speak, we say so much about ourselves – and thus we can so easily influence what we divulge…
As for those Christmas letters, it’s the first time I ever heard of them, but I think you should try out your talents as a fiction writer with them. Would be so much fun!
Comment by Nils — December 15, 2006 @ 10:24 pm |
tender [hooligan] – so am I now! Sounds lovely. Ms Make Tea – what a brilliant email anecdote. Sounds like a novel waiting to be written! Nils – only you could come up with an ‘underwater archaeologist’. I love it. If you had told me that at a party, I would have asked all kinds of awkward and detailed questions, in true academic style…
Comment by litlove — December 15, 2006 @ 10:43 pm |
I LRB personals, they are hilariously funny and I only wish I was so clever.
Since I only send out about 10 cards that need anything more than my name signed on them I write short, personal notes in each one. My mother, however, who used to complain something fierce about receiving such letters, has been sending out Christmas letters for years now. I’m not sure how she has reconciled it with her former thoughts on the matter.
Comment by Stefanie — December 15, 2006 @ 10:58 pm |
Oh, those Christmas letters — I hate them! What a cruel irony that you now have to write them! I can well imagine how difficult that must be. I’ve seen too many of the religious variety of those letters — “God has blessed us with wealth and fabulously intelligent children — aren’t we, oh, wait, isn’t God wonderful?”
Comment by Dorothy W. — December 16, 2006 @ 1:07 am |
For some of the funny extracts of “Don’t Tell Mum” Go to The Guardian – they ran some a while back:
http://travel.guardian.co.uk/article/2006/nov/06/gapyeartravel.bookextracts.gapyears#more-article
My personal favourite email back to mum:
“I know it is v dull to talk about the weather, but it is MINUS 30 degrees today [in northern Russia], so I think I am allowed. All my shampoo on my shelf etc freezes every night and children aren’t allowed to go to school because they walk too slowly and tend to freeze to death before they get there. Nice. I am slightly worried as I walk at the speed of a lobotomised snail, there is five inches of ice on the roads and my new boots have strayed far from their natural habitat (the wilds of High St Ken). On the first day of unbelievable iciness I happily stepped outside and within minutes my mascara had frozen my eyelids closed and my nostrils had iced over. After another few minutes I lost all feeling in my extremities, so by the time I reached the Institute I couldn’t see, smell or feel. I walk so slowly that I am often overtaken by octogenarian babushkas shuffling along in felt slippers with massive sacks of turnips on their backs. Every day Ludmilla smugly informs me that it is another 10 degrees colder than the day before and happily tells me how to notice the first stages of frostbite.”
Comment by Dark Orpheus — December 16, 2006 @ 3:20 am |
Too funny, Stefanie! And fancy you getting the LRB – I am naive to think it doesn’t cross the Atlantic. Dorothy -oh yuk! I should point out in all fairness that the Christmas letters we receive tend to be of the straighforwardly informative and restrained sort. So I do have good role models to follow! One of my husband’s distant relatives writes absolutely hilarious ones each year. She has gap year-age children and they are more like edited highlights of ‘Don’t Tell Mum’! Dark Orpheus – thank you for the link and the excellent email example. That is indeed a classic.
Comment by litlove — December 16, 2006 @ 11:01 am |
OMG, the thank you letters bit really hit home recently…
I had bought a friend a present for his birthday, from his Amazon wish list. A few days after the event, I received a thankyou email, which I was convinced had be auto-sent by Amazon – it was a cross between the product review and a little bit of personalisation. Anyway, I saw the person concerned recently, and said how funny I thought the automated thanks had been (another friend who was there had also had a similar experience and so we both laughed). Until, of course, the recipient informed us (with a po-face) that he’d actually written the thankyou emails himself, and they were serious!!!
Ooops…
He’s still talking to us (just).
Comment by Caz Mockett — December 16, 2006 @ 12:38 pm |
A very enjoyable post. I am glad to have discovered you and I will be back for many more reads in future.
Comment by David Raho — December 16, 2006 @ 1:45 pm |
Some years ago I had an undergrad who did her dissertation on the language used in Lonely Heart columns. I don’t know about the humour travelling, but we needed a translation for some of the US ones. Her real concern was in respect of the match between the way men described the women they were looking for and the way women described themselves. There wasn’t one! Makes you wonder if they ever work.
On the subject of Round Robin letters, I received my annual contribution from an ex-student this morning. Every year I get the next installment of her on-off relationship with the same man. She pointed out in a postscript to this one that we’d known ech other twenty years now. I wish he’d make his mind up.
Comment by Ann — December 16, 2006 @ 3:46 pm |
I think the young adults who write those gap year emails (particularly the one upthread from the coldest place on earth) are the younger siblings of the lonely hearts, if that one email from snowland is any indication. Do British people write self deprecating Christmas letters too? Are obituaries similarly modest?
In the United States, personal ads tend to be unintentionally hilarious works of self aggrandizement (man with large member and larger income looking for woman twenty years younger whose chest size is in inverse proportion to her brain and judgment.) And Christmas letters are pretty much written in the same smug vein (family with hugely successful children had hugely amazingly successful year full of fabulous vacations, big raises, all the while continuing to maintain a trim weight and a tidy home.) I love getting them and spend a lot of time reading them out loud with weird fake accents.
But now I’m thinking I should write one for our family, one that combines the best of British personal ad writing and gap year disaster reporting. I’ll post it in a few days.
You’re an inspiration.
xo, BL
Comment by bloglily — December 16, 2006 @ 5:32 pm |
Caz – wonderful story! I’m glad to know you ended it all on speaking terms too! David – welcome – and I’d be delighted if you drop in again. Ann – that must have been one of the funnest (as my son would say) theses in existence. And I do love the tale of the on-off relationship. What would she write about if the matter were resolved? Dear Bloglily – I’m looking forward immensely already to your letter. I have to say that even when it comes to obituaries, the Brits are very cautious. To boast about the dead would probably be considered the ultimate in vulgarity!
Comment by litlove — December 16, 2006 @ 6:02 pm |
I f*****g hate personals. But that is just because I have not had much success using them.
Comment by Kyle Korleski — December 16, 2006 @ 10:16 pm |
Kyle – I’ve just been over to check your site. Don’t give up! One of my friends from university is getting married for the first time next year (she’ll be 38). It can just take a long time to find the right person sometimes. Hang on in there.
Comment by litlove — December 16, 2006 @ 10:49 pm |