Tales from the Reading Room

November 27, 2006

What Really Makes Me Angry…

Filed under: Higher Education, Personal, Thoughts — litlove @ 11:14 am

 

…is injustice. And there are times when I despair of the injustices which rage unchecked within my university. I’m going to be writing to my college’s Master today, the complaints bureau for registering the most grievous offences, and I thought it would be better to get things off my chest first, in the hope I can then write a reasoned and incisive letter to him, rather than a dismissable rant. Last week I saw the young graduate woman who is covering my teaching while I’m on leave. She has nearly finished her PhD, and so it should, in theory, be helpful to her to take on some teaching while writing up, and earning some money at the same time. However, she confessed to me that my delightful college has failed to tell her how much they will pay her, or how they will pay her, or even when they will pay her, with the result that she’s been working now for two months without being paid or knowing when a cheque will arrive. She has already emailed the college authorities about this but hasn’t heard anything back yet and ‘doesn’t want to keep bothering them.’ I was somewhat outraged on her behalf; it is a classic manoeuvre within the university as a whole to exploit those members who have the most hope for advancement and the least certainty of achieving it. No one would dream of making some old high-ranking professor wait a second for his conference expenses to be reimbursed, but some poor soul way down in the academic food chain, well, they’ll just have to manage somehow.

 

It reminded me of the time, a couple of year’s back now, when I opened a letter from the finance department that calmly informed me I’d been overpaid in my last salary instalment, and so they were simply going to dock this month’s pay. The sum in question was over a thousand pounds. Well, to this day I am not sure that this move was legal. At the time, I was frantic about it as my husband was on an 18-month course, which meant I was the main breadwinner. Now, don’t make me laugh with the thought of academics as breadwinners – the secretary who will open my letter to the Master and hand it over to him earns more than I do. And perhaps you’re wondering why I didn’t notice the overpayment? Well, I get paid quarterly, that’s right – four times a year, with a little each month deducted from the quarter, to be going on with. My pay is a mix of teaching, admin, and base salary that is calculated in a manner so opaque to me that I have no idea how much money to expect each quarter, and indeed, it is wildly different every time. It’s little wonder that academics have such trouble getting mortgages! OOOHHH it makes me SO cross that this stupid, outdated, bureaucratic system exerts a stranglehold over what ought to be the straightforward business of earning a living. The entire university is crippled by a top heavy administrative structure that decrees our fate without insight or generosity. My colleague once quoted an article to me that described how the top fifteen or so apparatchiks in the university earn more, together, than all the lecturers in the entire university. And then when the university gets into debt, as it so frequently does, who do you think has to carry the fall for that?

 

I’m afraid that’s not all: you’d better brace yourselves. This attitude of ‘once I’m in power I can feather my own nest at the expense of everyone else’ is hopelessly endemic. Effectively I work in a strict hierarchy with no welfare state, hence the degree of political apathy that abounds. Once you have a nice, warm nest, there is little point in disturbing it for the sake of chilly fledglings. Now, just over a week ago I received a shock email from another university inviting me to apply for a chair. I’m sorry, that probably sounds ridiculous. A chair means a professor’s post and it’s the highest level you can reach in a UK university. Once I’d rescued my eyeballs from the carpet and dusted them off and put them back in, and once I’d stopped checking the email to make sure it hadn’t been wrongly addressed, I was still in shock. You see, I’m at quite a lowly level here. The big distinction is whether you’re employed by the university or a college. If you’re employed by the university you are instantly on a scale of progression, which offers the opportunity to improve pay and status depending on assessments of teaching and research. If you are employed by the college there is no corresponding progression. No pay rises, no nothing. The unfortunate thing is that the job is exactly the same, in fact for CTO’s (those employed by colleges), yup, you’ve guessed it, there’s a little more grafting on the coal face to be done. I’ll bet you’ve also guessed by now who employs me.

 

So why am I not rushing to apply for this new post? Well, it’s not solely my decision to make. My husband earns more than I do, even if I were in a professor’s job, and my son has absolutely no desire to move house. And between you and I, flattering though it is to be invited, a chair’s job is essentially admin and I have not reached such a state of eminence that I can face getting up in the morning to a day of committee meetings. I don’t know as I’ll ever be that eminent. I really like teaching and I really like research. I just wish that, as my career progresses, I could do a few hour’s less teaching in a week. I promise you it’s not empty whining. The average UTO teaches say 60 or so hours a term, maybe 80 if they’re very oversubscribed. The last term I taught, I did 120 contact teaching hours, and it’s no wonder that I was exhausted. I really don’t want to return to that. So of course, I made the usual move of contacting the necessary authority in college to see if I could use the invitation as any kind of leverage with my own employer. Want to have a guess now what happened? You’re right! Absolutely nothing at all. What made me very angry, however, was to find out that the UTO’s (those employed by the university) had decided last year to award themselves less teaching if they felt like it, but had not decided to extend this courtesy to the CTO’s. They made the decision for them that they needed to teach just as much as they ever did, with no concessions. Like I say, if you’re low in the academic food chain, these things just happen to you, and you have to manage. When I return after my year’s leave, it will be back to the old 120 hours and exhaustion for me.

 

What makes me the angriest of all is that this unequal structure works at the university-wide level of arts and sciences. Sciences are smiled upon by the university because the nature of the work they do means they bring in research grants of millions of pounds (when put together) from government and industry. That’s what it’s all about in the universities these days – who can bring in the most money from outside. Now the nature of the arts means that that inevitably we lose this particular battle. But the administrators are unable to accept this and have insisted that we all start our own fundraising, or else lots of jobs will be lost. Now excuse me, but I thought we already had sufficient work educating the young and researching for the good of our society’s sum of knowledge. Now we have to run businesses as well? What are we supposed to do? Set up a crêperie in the corner of the French department? I did suggest that I could take my tarot cards to the empty office alongside the Year Abroad office, and declare myself the Year Ahead office. But of course we can’t do these things. The result is that we’re facing job cuts. Actually I was wrong to say that makes me angry; in fact it just makes me very, very sad.

 

Fundamentally, what’s wrong with the system is that it’s all too easy to be complicit with it, either as a young lecturer, working every hour in order to climb the greasy pole in the hope of recognition and advancement, or as a settled professor, reaping the rewards of power and influence. But I don’t like it one little bit, and I’m not afraid to say so, either. If anyone would like to construct a barricade in the Humanities’ car park, I will happily stand on it. In the meantime, the best I can do, and it’s very little in the face of all that ought to be done, is to try to get a pay packet to the lovely young woman who is filling in for me. Wish me luck.

 

20 Comments »

  1. My husband used to rail against the same kind of injustice — how poorly sessional lecturers were treated. These lecturers were thinking that if they did a good job, they would be hired as permanent staff, but it never happened. They would work like dogs for starvation wages — and then be let go. Shouldn’t universities be places of justice?

    Comment by Nancy Ruth — November 27, 2006 @ 12:58 pm | Reply

  2. And I thought it was only American universities that were poor-paying, myopically-run, cruelly-hazing places. I have this sort of idealized vision of UK schools, despite having read all of David Lodge’s academic satires. On another note, your book idea from the previous post sounds absolutely perfect, exactly what you should be working on.

    Comment by BikeProf — November 27, 2006 @ 1:42 pm | Reply

  3. Nancy Ruth, you have it just about right. I’m so sorry to think that nothing has changed, nor is likely to change in our university systems. And if supposedly smart people can’t organise a just society, who can? Well, compassionate people, I suppose, and they appear to be quite different. Bikeprof – I was very sorry indeed to find out that my own illusions about the lovely US system were equally out of kilter! What’s going on? We said we’d stick together with our new projects this year, and it’s taken me a while to find the right one, but I’ll be trying to catch up with you.

    Comment by litlove — November 27, 2006 @ 2:23 pm | Reply

  4. Grrrrrr – I had not realised the Thatcherite ideals had persisited. There seems to be a concerted effort worldwide to make everything pay for itself. This has to reduce the ability of the Humanities departments to do their job. Our children and grandchildren will be turned into mindless drones by the Universities of the Scientific Future. No humanity will remain.

    Comment by archiearchive — November 27, 2006 @ 3:49 pm | Reply

  5. That’s hideous. Just – hideous. Good for you for standing up for the woman covering for you, though. I can’t imagine your frustration and anger – it sounds wholly unfair. Unfortunately, I believe this to be the case across the field – it’s the same here in the US. If only something could be done!

    Comment by everythinginbetween — November 27, 2006 @ 7:19 pm | Reply

  6. I do wish you luck and think you are right to focus first on getting this one injustice fixed. And I’m certain you will.

    There are many, many things wrong with the system you describe — from the way people are complicit in it, and the inequality among peers, and the shoddy record-keeping, and the overwhelming hours. It’s say a lot about your students, and your work, that you put up with it.

    I’m glad you’ve written about it, and am also happy to know you’ve got such a great idea for another book, one that’ll reach a lot of people. As for the university, one day you will leave them for a post that doesn’t take so much out of you, and that works with where your husband and son are in their own lives. And when you do, you’ll be the sort of person with power who doesn’t forget what it’s like to have survived the system you describe.

    Comment by bloglily — November 27, 2006 @ 7:35 pm | Reply

  7. I do love a good dose of righteous indignation in the morning! How wise you are to blow off steam this way BEFORE registering your outrage in more formal communication. You don’t need my help crafting your “reasoned and incisive letter” to the Master, but I do recommend you strike the reference to how much his secretary makes before your letter passes through those hands!

    Regarding whether the most valuable work pays for itself, I have this to offer:

    Don’t worry that your idea will be stolen. If it’s any good, you’ll have to cram it down people’s throats.

    Comment by davidbdale — November 27, 2006 @ 7:57 pm | Reply

  8. I always have such high hopes for universities as being the bastions of intelligence, compassion and diversity. Then they turn out to be just like a stinky old Corporation. Or any other money-making institution. Full of greed, ignorance, fear.

    Comment by LK — November 27, 2006 @ 8:58 pm | Reply

  9. Archie – I think the teaching in humanities cannot help but be affected. Well, it is being so already – we’ve cut back on contact hours with students and I’m sure it won’t be long before fewer papers/modules are offered them. It’s hugely frustrating because the thing we do really, really well, is teach. Courtney – I’m glad you agree and it’s not just me seeing red. I think shaming authorities into ethical behaviour would be a good place to start. Nobody will speak up because people are afraid for their own careers, and so we end up with ‘bunker mentality’. Collective action would be good, too, well, it’s just about starting somewhere. Dear Bloglily, the problem with academics is that they do it for passion of the subject. If only they didn’t, these inequalities wouldn’t exist, but of course, something else very valuable would be lost as well. Thank you for your kind encouragement. I used to want to save the world, but these days, I’ll be content if I can just get someone paid. David, I think it’s more than just the comment about his secretary that I’ll need to leave out of the draft to the Master!! :-) But I do think also that if you are being critical, you need to be especially polite and reasonable, otherwise you are too easily ignored. I love the saying about the good idea! LK – I had high hopes too, but as you say, all big organisations tend to resemble each other in their disadvantages. It’s an awful shame.

    Comment by litlove — November 27, 2006 @ 10:07 pm | Reply

  10. Sigh! It’s the same everywhere. I am a young sessional lecturer at an Australian university. While I do actually get paid, I have similar problems to your replacement lecturer. I have written a post linking to your blog post.

    Comment by Legal Eagle — November 28, 2006 @ 1:49 am | Reply

  11. Amen. Let’s start a romantic commune-academy thing where things aren’t so rotten and people actually care about people more than “power and influence” and money. In fact, is there any way around this dang greasy pole? Maybe I should just work at a coffee shop or a book store and write in my spare time… sigh.

    Comment by Casey — November 28, 2006 @ 4:36 am | Reply

  12. I’ve quite enjoyed reading here this evening, although the substance of the matter was in the form of rant. Rant is good, sometimes, for force of passion, if it be controlled passion, is creative, mind-clearing and productive.

    My lifework and situation little resembles yours, yet, during my 68 years, have I seen injustice served up as a respectable and delectable dish.

    Thank you for caring.

    I wish you every blessing and joy.

    Shirley Buxton
    http://www.writenow.wordpress.com

    Comment by Shirley — November 28, 2006 @ 4:54 am | Reply

  13. Wow, your system sounds like an immense maze and there isn’t even a piece of cheese at the end!! It is top heavy in terms of pay over here, too. Admin people always get the most! And they keep professors as adjuncts or part time, so they don’t have to give them tenure. And I won’t even discuss the lowly staff like me. These days everything is run like a corporation. I am seeing it happen in the library even more and more. $$$$$. That seems to be what it all comes down to–even in this wonderful bastion of education where we work. Good luck! And I hope grad student who is teaching your classes is paid for her work! How horrible—she doesn’t need money….she is just doing this for the thrills!

    Comment by Danielle — November 28, 2006 @ 6:09 pm | Reply

  14. Poor Legal Eagle – you have my every sympathy, and later on I shall come over and read your post. It really does seem to be a global problem. Casey, I always promised myself that if I ever came into money I would start a philanthropic venture of some kind. I really fancied opening a kind of commune where people could come and write while all that tedious stuff – cooking, cleaning, washing, was done for you, and where people could inspire each other and work as a community and even produce joint ventures. Much better than a greasy pole, no? Shirley – thank you for visiting. I don’t often rant, it’s just that this one got the better of me. Danielle, $$$$$ – you have it pretty much spot on there! And education is just not suited to being a business. I do hope the thrills are outweighing the lack of real cash for my poor grad!

    Comment by litlove — November 28, 2006 @ 6:30 pm | Reply

  15. How nice of you to help the person who is filling in get her pay. It sounds like your concern for her is a raity at your university.

    And it’s always good to get the rant out before the actual letter. Keeps you from saying something you might regret later.

    Comment by Stefanie — November 28, 2006 @ 7:25 pm | Reply

  16. oh this all sounds too familiar unfortunately. Having a friend who is working doggedly on her path to a PhD and professor-dom is all ready dealing with and witnessing such issues and she is a lowly T.A. I have often considered becoming a professor but I don’t know if I am passionate enough to deal with everything else.

    I do hope your letter has some positive effect!

    Comment by imani — November 28, 2006 @ 7:58 pm | Reply

  17. Stefanie – yes, it’s so tempting to overstep the mark and say something you shouldn’t, and it’s funny how the smallest thing will undermine the overall impression a letter makes. Better out in a safe forum!! Imani – it really does seem to be a widespread problem. I wonder if its the average personality of the academic that results in political apathy, or the innate inequality of the system that manages to divide and rule? I’ll let you know if anything comes of the letter in a couple of weeks or so (nothing moves fast around here either!).

    Comment by litlove — November 28, 2006 @ 11:35 pm | Reply

  18. This makes me so angry. I spent a number of years in the ghetto of casual employment around Universities and oh, the stories I could tell.

    Nowadays, as a course co-ordinator I try really hard to treat my tutors decently. I fight for them to get copies of the text book rather than having to buy their own. I won’t ask them to do extra unpaid work like invigilating tests- and it makes me really mad that this is not the norm especially considering that the people we employ for casual teaching are usually students too which means we should be doubly concerned about their welfare and workload rather than carelessly treating them as a resource to be exploited.

    Comment by Make Tea Not War — November 29, 2006 @ 2:06 am | Reply

  19. Och, you fill my aspiring-academic veins with dread Litlove… :-( It really is terrible.

    We were talking at work only the other day about the inequality of support given to the sciences and the humanities, and how, when funding does wend its way to arts subjects, it goes to ‘buzzword’ projects and not to the students and researchers on the ground, in the thick of it. Grrrr….

    Comment by Victoria — November 29, 2006 @ 8:53 am | Reply

  20. Thank you for your kind wishes, Litlove! As it happens, I found out today that my contract is 90% likely to be renewed next year (phew!) – I will feel much better when I get that in writing (once a lawyer, always a lawyer) – but it’s good to know that I have support!

    Comment by Legal Eagle — November 29, 2006 @ 11:08 am | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Blog at WordPress.com.